Network Working Group Z. Li Internet-Draft J. Dong Intended status: Informational Huawei Technologies Expires: 11 January 2024 R. Pang China Unicom Y. Zhu China Telecom L. Contreras Telefonica 10 July 2023 Realization of Composite IETF Network Slices draft-li-teas-composite-network-slices-01 Abstract Network slicing can be used to meet the connectivity and performance requirement of different applications or customers in a shared network. An IETF network slice may be used for 5G or other network scenarios. In the context of 5G, a 5G end-to-end network slice consists of three different types of network technology segments: Radio Access Network (RAN), Transport Network (TN) and Core Network (CN). The transport segments of the 5G end-to-end network slice can be provided using IETF network slices. In some scenarios, IETF network slices may span multiple network domains, and IETF network slices may be composed hierarchically, which means a network slice may itself be further sliced. This document first describes the possible use cases of composite IETF network slices, then it provides considerations about the realization of composite IETF network slices. For the interaction between IETF network slices with 5G network slices, the identifiers of the 5G network slices may be introduced into IETF networks. For the multi-domain IETF network slices, the Inter-Domain Network Resource Partition Identifier (Inter-domain NRP ID) is introduced. For the hierarchical IETF network slices, the structure of the NRP ID is discussed. These network slice-related identifiers may be used in the data plane, control plane and management plane of the network for the instantiation and management of composite IETF network slices. This document also describes the management considerations of composite network slices. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Li, et al. Expires 11 January 2024 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Composite IETF Network Slices July 2023 Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 11 January 2024. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. Composite Network Slice Use Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1. Multi-domain IETF Network Slices . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2. Hierarchical IETF Network Slices . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2.1. Per-Customer Network Slices in an Industrial Slice . 5 2.2.2. Per-Application Network Slices in a Customer Slice . 6 2.2.3. Network Slice Services in a Wholesale Network Slice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3. Realization of Composite Network Slices . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.1. Composite Network Slice Related Identifiers . . . . . . . 8 3.2. Composite Slice Network Resource Partitioning . . . . . . 9 3.3. Data Plane Encapsulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.3.1. Multi-domain Network Slice Encapsulation . . . . . . 10 3.3.2. Hierarchical Network Slice Encapsulation . . . . . . 11 3.3.3. 5G E2E Network Slice Encapsulation . . . . . . . . . 11 3.4. Composite Slice Control Plane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4. Management Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 7. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Li, et al. Expires 11 January 2024 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Composite IETF Network Slices July 2023 8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 1. Introduction Network slicing can be used to meet the connectivity and performance requirement of different applications or customers in a shared network. [I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices] defines the terminologies and the characteristics of IETF network slices. It also discusses the general framework, the components and interfaces for requesting and operating IETF network slices. The concept Network Resource Partition (NRP) is defined as a subset of network resources in the underlay network and the associated policies, which can be used to deliver the IETF network slice services with the required Service Level Objectives (SLOs) and Service Level Expectations (SLEs). [I-D.ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn] describes the framework and the candidate technologies for providing enhanced VPN (VPN+) services. VPN+ leverages the VPN and Traffic Engineering (TE) technologies and adds characteristics that specific services require beyond those provided by conventional VPNs. VPN+ could be used to deliver IETF network slice services, and could also be of use in general scenarios providing enhanced connectivity services between customer sites. For delivering VPN+ service, the concept of Virtual Transport Network (VTN) is introduced, which is a virtual underlay network consisting of a set of dedicated or shared network resources allocated from the physical underlay network, and is associated with a customized network topology. VPN+ services can be delivered by mapping one or a group of overlay VPNs to the appropriate VTNs as the underlay, so as to provide the network characteristics required by the customers. In the context of IETF network slicing, NRP can be seen as an instantiation of VTN. An IETF network slice may be used in 5G or other network scenarios. In the context of 5G, the 5G end-to-end network slices consist of three different types of network technology segments: Radio Access Network (RAN), Transport Network (TN) and Core Network (CN). The transport segments of 5G end-to-end network slice can be provided using IETF network slices. In some scenarios, IETF network slices may span multiple network domains, and IETF network slices may be composed hierarchically, which means a network slice may itself be further sliced. Li, et al. Expires 11 January 2024 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Composite IETF Network Slices July 2023 This document first describes the possible use cases of composite IETF network slices, then it provides considerations about the realization of composite IETF network slices. For the interaction between IETF network slices with 5G network slices, the identifiers of 5G network slice may be introduced into IETF networks. For the multi-domain IETF network slices, the Inter-Domain Network Resource Partition Identifier (Inter-domain NRP ID) is introduced. For the hierarchical IETF network slices, the structure of the NRP ID is discussed. These network slice related identifiers may be used in the data plane, control plane and management plane of the network for the instantiation and management of composite IETF network slices. This document also describes the management considerations of composite network slices. 2. Composite Network Slice Use Cases 2.1. Multi-domain IETF Network Slices One typical scenario of multi-domain IETF network slice is to support 5G network slicing as shown in Figure 1. 5G end-to-end network slices consists of the slice subnets in RAN, Mobile Core and Transport networks. In the RAN and Mobile Core networks, the 5G end-to-end network slices are identified by Single Network Slice Selection Assistance Information (S-NSSAI). In the transport network, the 5G network slices are mapped to one or multiple IETF network slices. The IETF network slice itself may span multiple network domains. An IETF network slice may be realized as an inter-domain VPN+ service, which is similar to the inter-domain VPNs with additional resource and performance commitments. In the underlay network, the IETF network slices can be mapped to one or multiple inter-domain NRPs, which is the concatenation of multiple intra-domain NRPs from different network domains. Li, et al. Expires 11 January 2024 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Composite IETF Network Slices July 2023 5G Network Slices (S-NSSAI) o--------------------------------------------------------------------o /----\ /----\ /----\ /----\ /----\ / \ // \\ // \\ // \\ / \ | RAN |---| TN-1 |---| TN-2 |----| TN-3 |----| Core | \ / \\ // \\ // \\ // \ / \----/ \----/ \----/ \----/ \----/ Multi-domain IETF Network Slice o--------------------------------------------------o Multi-domain NRPs o=========================================o Intra-domain Intra-domain Intra-domain NRPs NRPs NRPs o**********o o***********o o***********o o##########o o###########o o###########o o@@@@@@@@@@o o@@@@@@@@@@@o o@@@@@@@@@@@o Figure 1. Multi-domain IETF Network Slice in 5G Scenario 2.2. Hierarchical IETF Network Slices 2.2.1. Per-Customer Network Slices in an Industrial Slice A typical hierarchical network slice deployment scenario is in the multi-industrial network case, in which a shared physical network is used to deliver services to multiple vertical industries. Separate IETF network slices are provided for different industries, such as health-care, education, manufacturing, governmental affairs, etc. Then within the network slice of a specific industry, it may be necessary to create separate network slices for some or all of the customers. For example, within the education network slice, some of the universities may require a separate network slice to connect a set of branch campuses. Another example is within the health-care network slice, some of the hospitals may require a separate network slice for the connectivity and services between a set of the branch hospitals. Li, et al. Expires 11 January 2024 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Composite IETF Network Slices July 2023 ---------------------------------/ / Industry Slice 1 / / ----------------------- / / / Customer Slice 1 / / / -----------------------/ / / ----------------------- / / / Customer Slice 2 / / / -----------------------/ / / ... / ---------------------------------/ ... ---------------------------------/ / Industry Slice 2 / / ----------------------- / / / Customer Slice 1 / / / -----------------------/ / / ----------------------- / / / Customer Slice 2 / / / -----------------------/ / / ... / ---------------------------------/ Figure 2. Hierarchical Network Slices: Scenario 1 2.2.2. Per-Application Network Slices in a Customer Slice Another network slice deployment case is to provide dedicated IETF network slices for some important customers as the first-level network slices. While the customers may require to split further the resources of their network slices into different sub-network slices for a subset of applications. For example, a network slice for a hospital may be further divided to carry different types of medical applications, such as remote patient monitoring, remote ultrasound diagnosis, medical image transmission etc. Li, et al. Expires 11 January 2024 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Composite IETF Network Slices July 2023 ---------------------------------/ / Customer Slice 1 / / ----------------------- / / / APP Slice 1 / / / -----------------------/ / / ----------------------- / / / APP Slice 2 / / / -----------------------/ / / ... / ---------------------------------/ ... ---------------------------------/ / Customer Slice 2 / / ----------------------- / / / APP Slice 1 / / / -----------------------/ / / ----------------------- / / / APP Slice 2 / / / -----------------------/ / / ... / ---------------------------------/ Figure 3. Hierarchical Network Slices: Scenario 2 2.2.3. Network Slice Services in a Wholesale Network Slice An IETF network slice can also be delivered as a wholesale service to other network operators. In this case, a network operator can be the customer of a network slice, and it may also need to deliver IETF network slice services to its customers. This is similar to the Carrier's Carrier VPN service, while additional requirements on the SLOs and SLEs required by the second-level network slice customer. Li, et al. Expires 11 January 2024 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Composite IETF Network Slices July 2023 ---------------------------------/ / Wholesale Slice 1 / / ----------------------- / / / Customer Slice 1 / / / -----------------------/ / / ----------------------- / / / Customer Slice 2 / / / -----------------------/ / / ... / ---------------------------------/ ... ---------------------------------/ / Wholesale Slice 2 / / ----------------------- / / / Customer Slice 1 / / / -----------------------/ / / ----------------------- / / / Customer Slice 2 / / / -----------------------/ / / ... / ---------------------------------/ Figure 4. Hierarchical Network Slices: Scenario 3 3. Realization of Composite Network Slices The realization of composite network slices may require additional capability and functionality in the data plane, control plane and management plane technologies. These considerations are analyzed in the following subsections. 3.1. Composite Network Slice Related Identifiers For the realization of multi-domain network slices, the following network slice related identifiers may be introduced in the management plane, control plane and the data plane. * Intra-domain NRP ID: This is the NRP-ID as defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-nrp-scalability]. It is used by the network nodes in a network domain to determine the set of local network resources allocated to an NRP. * Multi-domain NRP ID: This identifier uniquely identifies a multi- domain NRP. In each network domain, the domain border nodes can map the multi-domain NRP-ID to the intra-domain NRP IDs within the local network domain. Li, et al. Expires 11 January 2024 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Composite IETF Network Slices July 2023 A multi-domain network slice may be supported by a multi-domain NRP in the underlay, which consists of the concatenation of multiple intra-domain NRPs. Each intra-domain NRP can be identified using a domain-significant NRP ID. In order to facilitate the concatenation of multiple intra-domain NRPs into a multi-domain NRP, the multi- domain NRP may be needed. For the scenarios of 5G network slicing, in order to facilitate the mapping and management of 5G network slice services in the IETF network slices, the identifier of 5G network slice may be needed in the transport network. * 5G network slice ID (S-NSSAI): This identifies a 5G network slice. When required, it may be used by the network entities of IETF network slices to provide traffic mapping and monitoring at the 5G network slice granularity. For service scenarios which are not specific to 5G network slicing, other types of service identifiers may be used to classify and map the network slice services to the corresponding NRPs. The existence of the multi-domain NRP-ID depends on how the intra- domain NRP IDs are managed. In some network scenarios, different network domains are under the same network administration, and can have consistent NRP ID assignment, then the intra-domain NRP IDs may be used to identify the multi-domain NRPs. The awareness of the S-NSSAI and other network slice service identifiers depend on whether the performance of the 5G or other network slice services need to be monitored in the transport network. For the realization of hierarchical IETF network slices, since network resources may be partitioned hierarchically, the NRP IDs may be used to identify the first-level NRPs, the second-level NRPs, or both. 3.2. Composite Slice Network Resource Partitioning For multi-domain network slices, in order to fulfil the end-to-end network slice service commitment, it is important that the forwarding plane network resources in each of the involved network domain can be partitioned, so that intra-domain NRPs can be created in each network domain, which together constitute the multi-domain NRPs for the end- to-end network slice services. Li, et al. Expires 11 January 2024 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Composite IETF Network Slices July 2023 For hierarchical network slices, the forwarding plane network resources may need to be partitioned hierarchically. Taking a two- level hierarchical network slice as an example, the bandwidth and associated resources of a physical interface may need to be partitioned into two levels. In different network domains or different network slice hierarchy, different technologies may be used for the data plane resource partitioning. For example, for resource partitioning of multi-domain network slices, it could be the case that in one network domain, the forwarding resources is partitioned using Flexible Ethernet (FlexE), while in another network domain, the resources may be partitioned using dedicated queues under the same interface. Similarly, for hierarchical network resource partitioning, the network resources of the first-level NRPs may be partitioned using separate layer-3 sub- interfaces with dedicated link bandwidth, while the second-level NRPs may be further partitioned using virtual data channels under the layer-3 sub-interfaces. 3.3. Data Plane Encapsulation The considerations about the data plane encapsulation is mainly related to the mechanisms used to determine to which network slice a data packet belongs. At the ingress of an IETF network slice, service flows of network slice can be classified and mapped to corresponding NRPs using flexible matching rules based on operators' local policy, so that the set of network resources of the corresponding NRPs can be used for processing and forwarding the service packet. Such matching can be done based on one or multiple fields in the data packet. While on the intermediate network nodes, a dedicated data plane NRP Identifier [I-D.ietf-teas-nrp-scalability] can facilitate the identification of the NRP a packet belongs to. 3.3.1. Multi-domain Network Slice Encapsulation When IETF network slice service packets traverse a multi-domain NRP, the multi-domain NRP ID may be carried in the packet, so that the border nodes of each network domain can use it to determine the local domain NRP according to the mapping relationship between the multi- domain NRP ID and the local intra-domain NRP ID. The intra-domain NRP ID may also be carried in the packet for the NRP-specific packet processing on network nodes in the local domain. This requires that the involved network domains are considered as in the same trusted domain, in which the assignment of multi-domain NRP IDs is possible. Li, et al. Expires 11 January 2024 [Page 10] Internet-Draft Composite IETF Network Slices July 2023 3.3.2. Hierarchical Network Slice Encapsulation For hierarchical IETF network slices, each level of the hierarchical NRP needs to be identified using some fields in the data packet. One possible approach is to use NRP-specific resource-aware SIDs [I-D.ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments] to identify the set of resources allocated in the first-level NRPs, then use dedicated NRP IDs to identify the set of resources in the second-level NRPs. Alternatively, for better scalability [I-D.ietf-teas-nrp-scalability], data plane NRP IDs may be used to identify both the first-level NRPs and the second-level NRPs. There are different options in the design of the data plane NRP ID for hierarchical network slices. * The first option is to use a unified data plane NRP ID for both the first-level NRPs and the second-level NRPs. In this case, the first-level NRPs and the second-level NRPs may be distinguished using distinct NRP ID values. * The second option is to use hierarchical identifiers for the first-level NRP and the second-level NRP respectively. In this case, the first part of the identifier may be used to identify the first-level NRP, and the second part of the identifier may be used to identify the second-level NRP. Depends on the data plane technologies used, the hierarchical NRP may be encapsulated in a continuous field, or may be positioned in separate fields in the packet. 3.3.3. 5G E2E Network Slice Encapsulation In the context of 5G end-to-end network slicing, in order to facilitate the mapping and management of 5G network slice services to IETF network slices, the S-NSSAI of 5G network slice may be carried in the data packet sent to the transport network. For network slicing scenarios which are not specific to 5G, other types of service identifiers may be carried in the packet sent to the transport network. 3.4. Composite Slice Control Plane The control plane of multi-domain IETF network slices would be similar to that of the Inter-AS VPN services [RFC4364], possibly with additional information of network slice characteristics signaled in the control plane. The Inter-AS Option C mode is preferred due to the simplicity in network slice service endpoints provisioning, which requires to establish multi-domain NRPs in the underlay transport network. The Option A or Option B mode of inter-domain VPN may also be used for multi-domain IETF network slices, while they are not the Li, et al. Expires 11 January 2024 [Page 11] Internet-Draft Composite IETF Network Slices July 2023 focus of this document. In each network domain, the provisioning and distribution of the intra-domain NRPs may be done via either the local domain network slice controllers or a distributed control plane, then the multi-domain NRP is realized as the concatenation of multiple intra-domain NRPs. The allocation of the multi-domain NRP- ID and the mapping relationship between the multi-domain NRP ID and intra-domain NRP ID in each domain can be done by a IETF network slice controller which is responsible for multiple network domains. Alternatively, distributed control plane may be used advertise the NRP-specific path information to stitch the paths in intra-domain NRPs into a multi-domain NRP. For 5G end-to-end network slices, when S-NSSAI is carried in the network slice service packets, the IETF network slice controller may be responsible for the provisioning of the mapping relationship between the S-NSSAIs and the multi-domain NRP IDs at the edge of the transport network. For hierarchical network slices, the control plane is responsible for the distribution of the attributes and states of NRPs in different hierarchy both among network nodes in the NRP and also to the network controller. With different modeling of the network resource partitioning, the information may be advertised as either layer-3 or layer-2 network information, correspondingly the required protocol extensions may also be different. The details are out of the scope of this document. 4. Management Considerations For multi-domain network slices, some coordination in management plane among different network domains would be needed. That includes but not limited to the planning of intra-domain NRPs to meet the same or similar set of SLO and SLEs, the allocation and mapping of intra- domain NRP IDs with the multi-domain NRP IDs. For the hierarchical network slices, the management system of network operator needs to provide life-cycle management to both the first- level network slices and the second-level network slices. It should allow the management of the first-level and second-level network slices separately, while the relationship between the first-level and second-level network slices also need to be maintained in the management system. The management system may need to support additional functions and procedures for the management of hierarchical network slices. Further analysis of management plane requirements is for future study. 5. IANA Considerations This document makes no request of IANA. Li, et al. Expires 11 January 2024 [Page 12] Internet-Draft Composite IETF Network Slices July 2023 Note to RFC Editor: this section may be removed on publication as an RFC. 6. Security Considerations Several broad security considerations exist, and Section 6 of [I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices] highlights several important security aspects for network slice deployment and operation. These security considerations will apply to the architecture and techniques outlined in this document and multi-domain NRPs for end-to-end network slices. Ensuring that only authorised customers have access to end-to-end network slices is important. In addition, malicious intent to access, delete or modify the end-to-end service should also be mitigated or negated. The control plane may distribute attributes of different levels of hierarchical NRPs among network nodes, including communicating this information to the controller. Therefore, secure methods will be required to disseminate, control, and store NRP related information. Multiple data plane methods are applicable for instantiating the end- to-end network slice services. However, these techniques have security advantages and disadvantages and must be considered when deploying multi-domain and hierarchical network slices. In addition, some encapsulation methods will have stronger security or encryption capabilities that may be required for certain customer slice applications where confidentiality or securing data being transmitted across the end-to-end slice is needed. Future versions of this document will expand the security discussion and propose techniques to address security concerns, and highlight any missing requirements specific to this document. 7. Contributors Zhibo Hu Email: huzhibo@huawei.com 8. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Daniel King for his review and comments. 9. References 9.1. Normative References Li, et al. Expires 11 January 2024 [Page 13] Internet-Draft Composite IETF Network Slices July 2023 [I-D.ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn] Dong, J., Bryant, S., Li, Z., Miyasaka, T., and Y. Lee, "A Framework for Enhanced Virtual Private Network (VPN+)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-teas- enhanced-vpn-13, 7 July 2023, . [I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices] Farrel, A., Drake, J., Rokui, R., Homma, S., Makhijani, K., Contreras, L. M., and J. Tantsura, "A Framework for IETF Network Slices", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-21, 15 June 2023, . 9.2. Informative References [I-D.ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments] Dong, J., Bryant, S., Miyasaka, T., Zhu, Y., Qin, F., Li, Z., and F. Clad, "Introducing Resource Awareness to SR Segments", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- spring-resource-aware-segments-07, 31 May 2023, . [I-D.ietf-teas-nrp-scalability] Dong, J., Li, Z., Gong, L., Yang, G., Guichard, J., Mishra, G. S., Qin, F., Saad, T., and V. P. Beeram, "Scalability Considerations for Network Resource Partition", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- teas-nrp-scalability-02, 2 June 2023, . [RFC4364] Rosen, E. and Y. Rekhter, "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4364, DOI 10.17487/RFC4364, February 2006, . Authors' Addresses Zhenbin Li Huawei Technologies Huawei Campus, No. 156 Beiqing Road Beijing 100095 China Email: lizhenbin@huawei.com Li, et al. Expires 11 January 2024 [Page 14] Internet-Draft Composite IETF Network Slices July 2023 Jie Dong Huawei Technologies Huawei Campus, No. 156 Beiqing Road Beijing 100095 China Email: jie.dong@huawei.com Ran Pang China Unicom Email: pangran@chinaunicom.cn Yongqing Zhu China Telecom Email: zhuyq8@chinatelecom.cn Luis M. Contreras Telefonica Email: luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com Li, et al. Expires 11 January 2024 [Page 15]